Use-case selection
Identify workflows with enough repetition and friction to justify AI intervention.
Applied AI
I help security teams evaluate and adopt AI against real SOC workflows, operational controls and measurable outcomes.
What I focus on
AI can reduce friction in security operations, but it can also introduce new ambiguity, hidden assumptions and review burden. The useful question is not whether a product has AI. It is whether a specific workflow becomes better and whether that improvement survives real operational conditions.
Identify workflows with enough repetition and friction to justify AI intervention.
Test output quality, consistency, failure modes and analyst review requirements.
Challenge vendor claims against operational requirements, integration needs and controls.
Define where AI assists, where a human decides and where evidence must remain visible.
Integrate capability into existing processes rather than creating a parallel AI workflow.
Track time saved, quality, rework, consistency and downstream operational impact.
Experience
I have been directly involved in procurement and deployment of AI-enabled SOC technology, alongside practical experimentation with local and edge AI using NVIDIA Jetson hardware.
That combination matters because AI adoption in a SOC is not simply a model-selection exercise. It touches data access, analyst trust, quality assurance, escalation, auditability and service ownership.
Related
The operating-model and service context around AI adoption.
Explore security operations →Sentinel, Defender, KQL, detections and automation.
Explore Microsoft Security →Background across security operations, solution design and leadership.
View background →Contract enquiries
I can help turn the question from “which AI product?” into a controlled evaluation of real operational value.